Jury deliberations begin in man’s trial over using fatal chokehold on New York subway
NEW YORK — Jurors began deliberating and soon revisited some of their legal instructions Tuesday in the trial of a military veteran charged with using a fatal chokehold to subdue a New York subway rider whose behavior was alarming other passengers.
Jurors began deliberating Tuesday in the trial of a military veteran charged with using a fatal chokehold to subdue a man whose behavior was alarming passengers on a New York subway train.
The jury is weighing manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide charges in the death of Jordan Neely, a troubled street performer who was homeless.
The veteran, Daniel Penny, has pleaded not guilty.
Penny, 26, has said he was protecting fellow subway riders and intended only to restrain Neely and hold him for police, not to hurt him. Prosecutors say the Marine veteran used far too much force for too long when he gripped Neely by the neck for about six minutes.
The deliberations follow a month of testimony in the closely watched case.
It has animated debate about public safety, societal responses to mental illness and homelessness, the line between self-defense and aggression, and the role of race in all of it.
Jurors have heard opening statements in the trial of the man accused of choking a distressed Black subway rider to death last year in New York.
The 30-year-old Neely, who was Black, sometimes entertained passersby with Michael Jackson impersonations but also struggled with depression, schizo-phrenia and drug use after his mother was strangled during his teen years. Penny, who is white, was a college architecture student who served four years in the Marines.
Witnesses said Neely boarded a train in Manhattan on May 1, 2023, and started acting erratically, yelling about his hunger and thirst and proclaiming that he was ready to die, to go to jail or — as Penny and some other passengers recalled — to kill.
Penny came up behind Neely, grabbed his neck and head and took him to the floor. The veteran later told police he’d held Neely in “a choke” and “put him out” to ensure he wouldn’t hurt anyone.
City medical examiners ruled that Neely was killed by having his neck compressed in a chokehold. A pathologist hired by Penny’s defense contradicted that finding, attributing the death to a variety of other factors.
Penny’s lawyers argued that he used what they term a “civilian restraint,” departing from the chokehold technique he’d been taught in the military in order to control Neely without rendering him unconscious.
Prosecutors say Penny had the training to know that what he was doing could kill.
Wiley told jurors Tuesday that if they convict Penny of manslaughter, they won’t be asked for a verdict on the lesser charge of criminally negligent homicide. If they decide he’s not guilty of manslaughter, they’ll consider the second charge.
Manslaughter requires proving that a defendant recklessly caused another person’s death. The standard entails, among other things, consciously disregarding a substantial and unjustifiable risk that an action will be deadly.
Criminally negligent homicide involves engaging in serious “blameworthy conduct” while not perceiving such a risk.
Both charges are felonies. Neither carries mandatory prison time, but both carry the possibility of it — up to 15 years for manslaughter, or four for criminally negligent homicide.
Deliberations will resume Wednesday.
Peltz writes for the Associated Press.
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
