Assange allowed to appeal to British Supreme Court over extradition to U.S.
LONDON — WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on Monday won the first stage of his effort to appeal a British court ruling that opened the door for his extradition to U.S. on espionage charges.
The High Court in London gave Assange permission to appeal the case to Britain’s Supreme Court. But the Supreme Court must agree to accept the case before it can move forward.
“Make no mistake, we won today in court,†Assange’s fiancee, Stella Moris, said outside the courthouse, noting that he remains in custody at Belmarsh Prison in London. “We will fight this until Julian is free.â€
The British Supreme Court normally takes about eight sitting weeks after an application is submitted to decide whether to accept an appeal, the court says on its website.
The decision Monday is the latest step in Assange’s long battle to avoid trial on a series of charges related to WikiLeaks’ publication of classified documents more than a decade ago.
A year ago, a district court judge in London rejected a U.S. extradition request on the grounds that Assange was likely to kill himself if held under harsh U.S. prison conditions. U.S. authorities later provided assurances that the WikiLeaks founder wouldn’t face the severe treatment his lawyers said would put his physical and mental health at risk.
With his shock of Warhol-white hair, black leather jacket and self-proclaimed mission to lay bare official malfeasance, Australian-born Julian Assange burst onto the world stage more than a decade ago with his creation of the WikiLeaks website.
Last month, the High Court overturned the lower court’s decision, saying the U.S. promises were enough to guarantee that Assange would be treated humanely. Those assurances were the focus of Monday’s High Court ruling allowing Assange to appeal to the Supreme Court.
Assange’s lawyers say the U.S. offered its assurances only after the lower court had already rejected the extradition request. The High Court overturned the ruling anyway, saying that the lower court judge should have given the U.S. the opportunity to offer the assurances before she issued her decision.
On Monday, the High Court gave Assange permission to appeal to the Supreme Court so that it could decide “in what circumstances can an appellate court receive assurances from a requesting state ... in extradition proceedings.â€
Assange’s lawyers have argued that the U.S. government’s pledge that Assange won’t be subjected to extreme conditions is meaningless because it’s conditional and could be changed at the discretion of American authorities.
News Alerts
Get breaking news, investigations, analysis and more signature journalism from the Los Angeles Times in your inbox.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
The U.S. has asked Britain to extradite Assange so that he can stand trial on 17 charges of espionage and one charge of computer misuse linked to WikiLeaks’ publication of thousands of leaked military and diplomatic documents.
Assange, 50, has been held at the high-security Belmarsh Prison in London since 2019, when he was arrested for skipping bail in a separate legal battle. Before that, he spent seven years holed up inside Ecuador’s embassy in London. Assange sought protection in the embassy in 2012 to avoid extradition to Sweden to face allegations of rape and sexual assault.
Sweden dropped the sex crimes investigations in November 2019 because too much time had elapsed.
American prosecutors say Assange unlawfully helped U.S. Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning steal classified diplomatic cables and military files that WikiLeaks later published, putting lives at risk.
Lawyers for Assange argue that their client shouldn’t have been charged because he was acting as a journalist and is protected by the 1st Amendment guaranteeing freedom of the press. They say the documents he published exposed U.S. military wrongdoing in Iraq and Afghanistan.
“He should not face criminal prosecution and decades in prison for publishing truthful information of great public importance,’’ said Barry Pollack, Assange’s attorney in the U.S.
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
