Ex-49ers star Dana Stubblefield’s rape conviction overturned under California’s Racial Justice Act
A week after Dana Stubblefield’s 2020 rape conviction was reversed by a California appellate court because of “racially discriminatory language” used by the prosecution during the trial, the former San Francisco 49ers star learned he will not be released from custody for at least two more weeks.
“It was a little bit of delay,” Allen Sawyer, one of the attorneys representing Stubblefield, told The Times on Friday following a hearing in the Superior Court of Santa Clara. “The court is waiting to determine if they have to wait for the remittitur to come back from the appellate court before they make a decision to [offer] bail.”
Another hearing was set for Jan. 17 to further address the matter.
“The judge is giving us a right to provide more information on the court’s jurisdiction to bail prior to the remittitur,” Sawyer said. “The judge said he was sympathetic. He understands [Stubblefield] should be restored to the position he was before the wrongful conviction. So we’re hoping that we get it sooner than later.”
Sawyer said that he and Kenneth Rosenfeld, a fellow attorney also representing Stubblefield, filed a motion Tuesday for Stubblefield’s release.
“He’s not at this point convicted of anything, not even a parking ticket,” Sawyer said. “We expect that he should be released until the time when it eventually comes back under what they call a remittitur from the appellate court to the trial court, officially notifying them of the reversal and instructing them on how to proceed.”
Former San Francisco 49er Dana Stubblefield has been sentenced to 15 years to life in prison for raping a developmentally disabled woman
Sawyer said he expects the remittitur to take place in February, at which time it will be decided if a retrial might be heard.
Stubblefield played 11 seasons in the NFL for San Francisco, the Washington Redskins and Oakland Raiders, earning defensive rookie of the year (1993) and defensive player of the year (1997) honors during his time with the 49ers.
In May 2016, Stubblefield was charged with raping a woman at gunpoint the previous year. During his trial, Stubblefield’s defense argued that the sex was consensual. He was sentenced to 15 years to life in prison in October 2020 after a jury found him guilty of forcible rape, forcible oral copulation and false imprisonment, and that he had used a firearm in committing the first two offenses.
Last week, the 6th District Court of Appeal reversed Stubblefield’s conviction based on the California Racial Justice Act of 2020, which prohibits judges, attorneys, law enforcement officers, among others, from exhibiting “bias or animus towards the defendant because of the defendant’s race, ethnicity, or national origin.”
The appellate court’s decision was based on language used in the prosecution’s closing argument, which began nearly two months after a white police officer killed George Floyd, a Black man, in Minneapolis on May 25, 2020, and sparked a summer of protests nationwide.
“In closing arguments, the prosecutor asserted the police made the decision not to search Stubblefield’s house [for a gun] based partly on the fact that he was a famous Black man,” the opinion reads. “The prosecutor claimed a search would have opened up ‘a storm of controversy,’ and added, ‘Can you imagine in Morgan Hill when they search an African-American —,” whereupon defense counsel objected. The trial court sustained the objection but gave the jury no admonishments or instructions with respect to this part of the prosecutor’s arguments.”
The NFL says its partnership with Jay-Z, whose Roc Nation company is set to produce the Super Bowl halftime show, won’t change after a woman accused the rapper of rape in 2000.
The opinion continued: “We find the prosecution violated the Racial Justice Act as codified in part at Penal Code section 745. The prosecution explicitly asserted Stubblefield’s race was a factor in law enforcement’s decision not to search his house. The statement implied the house might have been searched and a gun found had Stubblefield not been Black, and that Stubblefield therefore gained an undeserved advantage at trial because he was a Black man.
“Second, the claim that a search would ‘open up a storm of controversy’ implicitly referenced the events that followed George Floyd’s then-recent killing, appealing to racially biased perceptions of those events and associating Stubblefield with them based on his race. We find the prosecution’s statements constituted ‘racially discriminatory language about’ Stubblefield’s race within the meaning of Penal Code section 745, subdivision (a)(2), and we conclude his conviction was sought or obtained in violation of subdivision (a). ... We are required to vacate the conviction and sentence, find that it is legally invalid, and order new proceedings consistent with subdivision (a).”
The Santa Clara County district attorney’s office told The Times in a statement Tuesday that it is “studying the opinion.”
In an interview with TMZ on Monday, Rosenfeld said Stubblefield is “euphoric” over the reversal of his conviction and Sawyer added that their client is looking forward to being with his family upon his release.
Go beyond the scoreboard
Get the latest on L.A.'s teams in the daily Sports Report newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
