Protest calls for boycott of businesses

Group opposed to city’s immigration policy announces boycott, which local leaders call futile.A Santa Ana-based immigrant rights group that opposes Costa Mesa’s immigration enforcement decision today planned to repeat its call for a boycott of Costa Mesa businesses and for civil disobedience.

Local leaders disparaged the boycott plan as divisive and unproductive.

Nativo Lopez, a spokesman for Hermandad Mexicana Latinoamericana, first called for the boycott in late January. On Wednesday he announced he’ll take the issue to Costa Mesa City Hall, where he planned a press conference for today.

Lopez, along with several local labor unions and Latino advocacy groups, wants to force the Costa Mesa City Council to reconsider plans to train police to do immigration checks on people suspected of serious crimes.

The city’s plan is still being developed, and no police have yet had training from federal immigration authorities.

Protesters intend to create a sign to post in businesses that oppose the city’s plan, and to avoid businesses that won’t post the sign, Lopez said. He also will urge people not to cooperate with police, though he doesn’t advocate violence, confrontation or resisting arrest.

“You have to demonstrate that without the cooperation of the populace, the police cannot do its job, and there’s no reason for people to cooperate if they run the risk of being a target of inquiries about their status,” Lopez said.

He added that the tactics could be expanded around Orange County if Sheriff Mike Carona proceeds with plans to train deputies for immigration enforcement.

As the only commercial business operator on the council, Councilman Gary Monahan may take a more personal hit if many people participate in the boycott.

Protesters on Wednesday scrambled to organize in time for an evening fundraiser for state Senate candidate Diane Harkey at Skosh Monahan’s, the councilman’s restaurant.

Protesters oppose Harkey because she co-chaired the failed initiative to form a state border police force, said organizer Naui Huitzilopochtli, who is a member of the immigrant advocacy group the Tonantzin Collective.

And because Monahan voted for the immigration enforcement plan, his restaurant is “a perfect target for us,” Huitzilopochtli said.

Monahan said the protest wouldn’t change his mind.

“I walked outside my door and got called an ... [expletive] four times in 15 seconds.... This is not an educational protest; it’s confrontational, and if they think they’re going to convince this council member that what we did was wrong, this is not the way to do it,” he said.

He was unconcerned about a possible boycott.

“My customers are loyal,” he said. “This will not scare them away.”

Costa Mesa Chamber of Commerce President Ed Fawcett said he hasn’t heard any concerns from local businesses about the possible boycott.

Fawcett does not support the city’s immigration enforcement proposal, which was led by Mayor Allan Mansoor, but he said a boycott would unjustly punish businesses.

“This approach to solving the problem is not productive,” Fawcett said. “I’m opposed to it just as strongly as I’m opposed to Mansoor’s plan.”

Mansoor dismissed Lopez’s protest as “just trying to stir the pot.”

The protest effort may increase the workload for Costa Mesa Police Chief John Hensley, who has been meeting with community groups to explain the immigration plan. Failing to cooperate with police won’t help victims of crime, he said.

“I’m going to constantly get the message out that we do not want to be enemies of the community,” Hensley said.

To Councilwoman Katrina Foley, an open and honest debate is exactly what’s been missing since the council voted to pursue the immigration plan in December. Foley was one of two council members who voted against the plan.

“It’s a political stunt that the mayor has pulled, and we’re all suffering the consequences of it,” she said.

“There’s no dialogue going on; there’s been no committee set up to vet concerns and come up with a fair, compassionate, responsible plan; there is no discussion. There’s basically a lot of attacks and controversy.”

Councilman Eric Bever, who voted in favor of the immigration enforcement plan, and Councilwoman Linda Dixon, who opposed it, did not return calls for comment.