Greenlight ready to change
- Share via
June Casagrande
Greenlight leaders want the Greenlight Initiative guidelines changed.
As the threat of a lawsuit against the city looms, Greenlight
spokesman Phil Arst said that he wants the city to change the way it
approves hotel projects under Measure S, the Greenlight Initiative.
In recent months, Greenlight leaders and city officials have waged
a war of words over how to decide whether hotel proposals should go
to a Greenlight vote. The initiative requires that voters approve
projects that significantly exceed general plan limits for peak-hour
traffic trips, total square footage or number of homes.
But city guidelines for hotels don’t rely on square footage to
measure how projects will affect surrounding areas because hotels’
effects on the community are different from commercial and
residential developments. In a series of public meetings in 2000 and
2001, city officials and residents hammered out how this difference
should be taken into account in the Greenlight Initiative.
The guidelines they drafted say that, for hotel projects,
Greenlight should be triggered solely on traffic figures.
City Atty. Bob Burnham said that this decision was arrived at with
the cooperation of Greenlight supporters.
“The guidelines [were] adopted by the City Council, with the full
participation and apparent blessing of Measure S proponents,” Burnham
wrote in November.
Greenlight leaders late last year cried foul, saying they
disagreed that traffic should be the sole trigger. But this week, as
they threatened to sue the city over the matter, Greenlight leaders
shifted their focus to say that they want the City Council to rewrite
the Measure S guidelines to add square footage as a trigger for
Greenlight votes for new hotel projects.
“Our main theme is to get Measure S guidelines changed so that
hotels aren’t automatically exempt,” Arst said.
He added that, while the general plan considers only the number of
hotel rooms at a given site, a square footage measure could better
take into account large convention facilities that are part of
hotels.
The Greenlight leaders’ demand comes at a time when the city is
preparing to consider a move very similar to what they are asking
for. Burnham on Thursday said that city staff will likely present to
the council in several months a change to the way the city considers
some projects. The agenda item will likely ask whether general plan
amendments for hotels take square footage into account. The
difference is that the changes would not necessarily apply to Measure
S guidelines.
The city began considering the move late last year in response to
complaints from Greenlight supporters who argued that the 110-room
Regent Newport Beach Resort project at Marinapark should go to a
Greenlight vote instead of a general vote. But the council action
would not affect the Marinapark hotel; it would apply to future
projects.
The Regent Newport Beach Resort is slated to be on the ballot in
November, although there’s no telling whether the lawsuit could
change that. City Council members who sent the question to voters
said the project was not subject to a Greenlight vote. They said they
were sending it to voters only because they felt it was the best way
to decide the matter.
Arst and others protested, ultimately threatening to sue. They
said that the decision sets a bad precedent for usurping the
Greenlight Initiative in the future. They also charged that under
that method, some facts about the project were less likely to be made
public.
Burnham said that information such as lease terms on the
city-owned Marinapark property and projected tax revenue from the
project would be considered in public meetings before the vote.
“I challenge anybody to tell me honestly how the public will get
anything less than full information [by sending the matter to a
non-Greenlight vote],” Burnham said. “I believe the public will get a
lot more information.”
Arst said the group plans to file the suit in about two weeks if
an agreement isn’t reached before then.
* JUNE CASAGRANDE covers Newport Beach and John Wayne Airport. She
may be reached at (949) 574-4232 or by e-mail at
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.