Are we really making choices?
- Share via
In Islamic tradition, two philosophical schools of thought have
emerged concerning this question. The first was the Compulsionists,
who believe that man has no freedom of choice. Every decision,
utterance and action people make has already been predestined since
the time of creation. The second was the Free Will, who declare that
human beings are masters of their own acts. This notion is in
concordance with the Qur’an, which states, “None will be wronged in
anything, nor will you be requited anything except that which you
used to do” (36:54). Human beings have the freedom to act, but they
must bear the moral responsibilities and consequences of their
actions.
Imam Mostafa Al-Qazwini
Islamic Educational Center
of Orange County
Costa Mesa
Classically Anglican “Articles of Religion,” accepted by the
Episcopal Church in 1801 and included in the current Book of Common
Prayer as a “Historical Document,” give “both-and” answers to this
question: “Free will can do good only with the grace of God” (Article
X. Of Free-Will) and “Predestination to Life is the everlasting
purpose of God ...” (Article XVII. Of Predestination and Election)
the Book of Common Prayer (p. 845) says, “We are free to make
choices: to love, to create, to reason and to live in harmony with
creation and with God.”
Determinism is the theory that since God knows everything else,
God must also know everything each one of us will do and who is going
to heaven and who to hell; so, the die is cast before we even roll
it. As Presbyterian minister Frederick Buechner writes in “Wishful
Thinking,” “Theorizing about God in this way is like an isosceles
triangle trying to theorize the Great Pyramid of Cheops into the two
dimensions of the printed page. The fact that I know you so well,
that I know what you’re going to do before you do it, does not mean
that you are not free to do whatever you damn well please.”
The Very Rev. Canon
Peter D. Haynes
St. Michael & All Angels
Episcopal Church,
Corona del Mar
The author I.B. Singer was asked if he believed in free will. He
answered, “Of course, do I have a choice?” Judaism would affirm what
Shakespeare wrote, “The fault, dear Brutus, is not in the stars but
in ourselves.” Man is not a puppet dangling on a celestial string, a
pawn without responsibility in a game over which he has no control.
The entire moral-legal code of the Torah is based on the
assumption that people can choose between right and wrong, good and
evil. For only if man is free to choose can he accept responsibility
for his deeds, and only if man is responsible for his deeds can he be
rewarded or punished.
If we did not have the capacity to choose evil, if the thought of
sin was contrary to our very nature while the urge to do good drew us
with irresistible magnetic force, then we would do not evil. That,
though, would not make us good because imposed goodness is no
goodness. Man under duress is no man.
Samuel Johnson said, “With regard to free will, all philosophy is
against it and all experience is for it.” Man is a choosing being.
The stars move in their appointed orbits, but man can move backward
as well as forward and he alone can decide which it will be.
RABBI MARK MILLER
Temple Bat Yahm
Newport Beach
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.