Commissioners have their say
Your question as to “should council members be allowed to speak at
other city committee meetings?” misses the issue. Newport Beach has
many advisory committees; some of which have City Council members on
them. Council members routinely attend and participate in these
meetings.
The Planning Commission alone, of all city committees, is a body
that is charged with holding public hearings on legislative and
quasi-judicial matters affecting zoning and use of property. Some of
these matters go automatically to the City Council for final
approval, and others may end up there on appeal by citizens or
council members. These matters become highly technical and are
governed by complex state and local laws.
Because of this, most legislative bodies in California have
appointed planning commissions to conduct public hearings on these
matters. This lightens the workload of the city council and allows
the city council more time to deal with other municipal matters.
For this to work properly, the city council must have faith and
confidence in its planning commission and planning commissioners. In
addition, the planning commissioners need to feel the freedom and
ability to evaluate each issue before them on an independent and
influence free basis.
In general, the planning commission should reflect the philosophy
of the city council, but should feel free to make each decision based
upon the facts and not upon what it thinks the city council wants.
Each decision should be a reflection of weighing the factual
information against city policies and state and local zoning and
planning laws. Any interference or appearance of interference in this
process is improper.
Attendance by city council members at planning commission public
hearings can be interpreted as such. Council members testifying at
planning commission hearings raises the level of improperness.
Furthermore, it questions the ability of the council member to be
objective and impartial in a matter which may be before the city
council when the council member has already taken a formal position
on the matter at a planning commission public hearing.
The current Newport Beach Planning Commission has the backbone and
integrity not to be influenced by such behavior. However, if this
were to become common practice by City Council members, the Planning
Commission could become a compromised body which would do little to
serve the interests of the citizens of the city.
Councilman Dick Nichols’ unfounded suggestion that planning
commissioners were “taking money for this one” is almost laughable.
However laughable, it cannot go unchallenged.
The success of government is only a strong as the public’s
confidence in its integrity. To make such an unfounded comment and
have it widely reported in the press only undermines public
confidence and further reinforces the feelings that many in our
society have toward government. As such, it is an affront to the
current Planning Commission and does a great disservice to the many
hardworking and honest city staff and citizen volunteers who give
countless hours of their time for the betterment of our city.
Councilman Nichols should cease attending and speaking at Planning
Commission public hearings and he should publicly apologize to the
Planning Commission and the citizens he serves for his improper
behavior and unfounded charges. The bell cannot be un-rung, but such
an apology would partially undo the damage his behavior has done.
EDWARD SELICH
Newport Beach Planning Commissioner
Newport Beach
A clarification of the question is in order. Since council members
chair “committees,” I believe the question should refer to
“commissions.” City commissions do not include council members. The
“committees” research, investigate and discuss issues facing the city
and make recommendations to the city council. They do not make
decisions for the city. On the other hand, commissions do make
decisions directly affecting residents. The members of both the
committees and commissions are appointed by the city council. My
response is to the question, Should council members be allowed to
speak at commission meetings?
Commission meetings are public meetings and must abide by state
law (Ralph M. Brown Act) governing public meetings. Since council
members do not give up their rights as citizens, they are entitled to
speak at these public meetings and cannot be prohibited from doing
so. As City Atty. Burnham states, this is a matter of decorum, so
outright prohibition is not an option. The council could agree that
they will avoid such testimony, but I hope they do not.
The council appoints commissioners. This could lead people to
conclude that commissioners give more deference to a council member
than to an average citizen. This is both unfair to the commissioners
and to the council members. Both have been democratically chosen to
do a job, the council by direct selection (vote), and the
commissioners indirectly by being appointed by the elected officials.
It is unrealistic to believe that the two entities operate in
isolation from each other. As a resident, I prefer to have council
member comments on commission business aired in a public forum and to
be part of the public record.
As a commissioner, I invite and encourage comment at commission
meetings from all members of the public, including council members. A
person’s reputation, expertise and understanding of the situation is
what gives them standing, not their title or position.
DENNIS BAKER
Newport Beach Arts Commissioner
Newport Beach
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.