DEEPA BHARATH -- Reporter’s Notebook
- Share via
I never thought a day would dawn when I didn’t have an opinion on an
issue.
Sure, as reporters many of us probably strive for that seemingly
unattainable goal of objectivity. You try to be objective but avoiding
subconscious feelings and opinions is humanly impossible.
I’m not saying I’m 100% objective on the Dennis Rodman issue, but I
feel like I have a boarding pass to
disinterested-pursuit-of-the-truth-land.
I’ll tell you why. And bear with me if I’m making a short story long.
I rarely get to do that.
Last week, I got an unbelievable opportunity -- a chance to interview
Rodman -- to get the story from the party man himself.
The former NBA superstar is facing criminal charges that allege he
disturbed the peace of his neighborhood, as well as civil lawsuits
relating to noise generated from Josh Slocum’s restaurant, which Rodman
is associated with.
As I prepared to interview the man at the core of the controversy, my
head was like a crowded bus terminal -- when one thought pulled out,
another swerved right in. Just too many questions:
Dennis, what are you thinking?
What’s your definition of noise?
Do you think you are being discriminated against?
The man, in trouble with the law, the city and his neighbors, was
calm, in control and surprisingly restrained in his answers. He spoke his
mind and used some words my mother wouldn’t approve of, but he seemed at
peace.
“I just ask the city and the police every time,” he said. “What do you
want me to do? I’ll do it. You want me to control other people who come
to my parties? I can’t do that.”
Simply stated. But enough to get his neighbors’ blood boiling. I even
received phone calls from some of them the day after Rodman’s interview
was published.
John Slocum’s neighbor Mary Sericati said she sleeps with ear plugs
and a sound machine every night because the loud music from the
restaurant beats against her eardrums and sends vibrations through her
house.
She says her quality of life has been destroyed.
“[Rodman] says, ‘All you people who complain about noise, get a
life,”’ she said. “Well, you know what? I had a life before this. I liked
my house and my old life. It was a slice of heaven. Now, it’s all gone.”
Sericati’s passionate words turned my thoughts in a different
direction. How would I know how bad the noise is until I experienced it?
I don’t make much noise. I get irritated when I’m in the car with my
husband and he turns the volume up to the point where the sub-woofer
kicks in.
To have that noise -- probably amplified -- every day in my living
room? I shuddered at the thought.
It was that sudden episode of virtual reality -- of putting myself in
someone else’s shoes -- that jolted me out of my subjective perception of
the noise issue that stemmed from my initial instinctive response, which
was: “Leave the man alone.”
That’s right. I don’t have an opinion on the issue anymore. My mind is
a blank tablet. I officially don’t know whose side to take.
But I hope that my inability to pick sides will just help me be a
better reporter, peel the layers of the onion and understand the point of
view of those who sleep with earplugs and go to work with tired,
sleep-deprived eyes -- the people many call the “silent majority.”
And if you’re one of them, speak up. Because it’s your turn.
* DEEPA BHARATH covers cops and courts for the Pilot.
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.