GUY CARROZZO -- Mayor’ Column
The franchise agreement for a proposed toll road down the Santa Ana
River is set to expire in January. Fountain Valley is opposed to the
extension of the franchise agreement and the idea of the toll road.
The California Department of Transportation will make its decision in
the next few months. This franchise agreement has been in existence for
10 years and has been transferred to at least three private companies.
If this project were truly feasible, one could reasonably expect it
would have moved forward by now. In fact, franchise holder Interwest, now
known as American Transportation Development, told us last year that a
decision would be made by January 2000. However, a decision has yet to be
made.
Ample time has been given to the franchisee to perform, yet they have
collectively chosen not to perform. Unfortunately, Orange County toll
roads have not proven to be financially successful on their own.
This uncertainty of success had prompted American Transportation to
request taxpayers’ money to assume a great deal of upfront risk.
Fountain Valley and Santa Ana were successful in persuading the
governor to veto $5 million in public funding for the Orange Freeway
project. Robert Farris of American Transportation Development has been
quoted as saying, “We can’t take that kind of upfront risk.” This was
after learning of the governor’s veto.
Fountain Valley has grave concerns with the use of the Santa Ana
riverbed for the Orange Freeway extension, including noise,
unsightliness, potential loss of property and numerous environmental
issues related to the riverbed, particularly in light of the recent
severe problems of urban runoff contaminating ocean waters.
We are concerned with any potential reduction in the level of flood
protection afforded by the Santa Ana River and the contamination of
drinking water, because the Santa Ana River is used for percolation in
the Anaheim area.
As you are probably aware, the San Diego Freeway corridor through the
western portion of Orange County is close to capacity. We are adamantly
opposed to any contractual provision of the franchise agreement that
would prevent improvements to area freeways and streets. Numerous area
streets need improvements to increase traffic flow and capacity. We do
not think this so-called private toll road should have protections of
non-competition that are detrimental to the taxpayer.
Recently, I attended an Orange County Transportation Authority meeting
to testify against its support of extending the franchise agreement.
Chairwoman and Fountain Valley Councilwoman Laurann Cook expressed
strong opposition to endorsing the toll road extension. Unfortunately, we
were not successful, but in our effort, we did get the conditions to
eliminate or limit the competitive provision, which in the Riverside
Freeway toll way agreement prevented the state from making improvements
to any competing freeway near the Riverside freeway toll road. In the
Orange Freeway agreement, this would have prevented future improvements
to the Garden Grove, San Diego and Corona del Mar freeways.
This is a change in our favor. The next step is for us to meet with
Caltrans officials in Sacramento and further present our opposition to
the idea of a toll road in the Santa Ana River. * GUY CARROZZO is mayor
of Fountain Valley
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.