Tom Harman’s campaign donations, ethics questioned
- Share via
Eron Ben-Yehuda
HUNTINGTON BEACH -- City Councilman Tom Harman helped kill a
redevelopment project after receiving campaign contributions from
opponents of the plan, public records show.
Before a critical vote by the City Council in November, Harman, who is
running for a state Assembly seat, accepted more than $2,000 from two
businessmen who operate in the Holly-Seacliff industrial area, according
to campaign statements filed Jan. 7.
Cleaning up the 105-acre site, which houses oil wells and dilapidated
warehouses, was considered a top priority by the council. But at a
meeting Nov. 19, the council changed its mind, voting 5-2 (Mayor Dave
Garofalo and Councilwoman Pam Julien dissenting) to drop the plan from
its “major projects list.”
“We’re getting a lot of complaints from people who purchased homes
nearby,” said Gus Duran, the city’s housing and redevelopment manager.
“They don’t like to see the area as rundown as it is.”
Although a majority of the council agreed with him, Harman was the only
one who spoke against the redevelopment of the area, bounded by
Goldenwest Street, Ellis Avenue, Main Street and Yorktown Avenue. He said
the city was meeting with enough resistance on other projects, and he
didn’t want to add more controversy.
Duran doesn’t buy that excuse.
“Everything in Huntington Beach is controversial,” he said.
Less than a week before the vote, Harman’s campaign statements show a
$1,725 contribution from John Thomas, who owns an oil production facility
in the targeted area. Thomas had not given money to Harman’s Assembly
campaign until then, records show. Harman, who considers himself an
environmentalist, accepted the money even though Thomas is under
investigation for allegedly dumping oil in the Bolsa Chica, possibly
endangering wildlife in the sensitive habitat, said Orange County Deputy
Dist. Atty. Lance Jensen.
Before he voted, Harman did not disclose Thomas’ contribution, nor did he
mention a $500 donation he accepted two days earlier from a company that
recycles tires in the area.
Harman points out that the law doesn’t require him to abstain from voting
or even to disclose the source of political contributions he receives
before voting. He justifies his conduct by saying the country’s entire
political system runs on “tremendous” contributions from “special
interest groups.”
“It’s a very common practice,” he said. “We just have to deal with that.”
The owner of Ecology Tires Inc., Mike Ramsey, said the money could have
made a difference.
“Maybe it got his attention to go ahead and listen to me,” he said.
While Harman can’t personally benefit from votes he takes as a council
member, he can vote in ways that benefit his contributors, said Jim Knox,
executive director of the California chapter of Common Cause, a
nationwide public interest group that tracks abuses of power by
government officials.
“Unfortunately, that’s not against the law,” he said.
But that doesn’t make it right, he added.
The “broken” political system needs fixing “so elected officials are
accountable to taxpayers instead of their campaign contributors,” he
said.
Knox suggests that political campaigns be publicly funded.
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.