Doctor treating COVID-19 patients gambles on clot-busting drug
The woman was dying. Workers at New York’s Mt. Sinai Hospital were about to call her husband and break the news that there was nothing left to try. Then Dr. Hooman Poor took a gamble.
With high-stress, high-stakes decisions, doctors around the world are frantically trying to figure out how COVID-19 is killing their patients so they can attempt new ways to fight back. One growing theory: In the sickest of the sick, little blood clots clog the lungs.
Poor couldn’t prove it. The tests required would further endanger his staff, who were already at risk of exposure to the novel coronavirus, which causes COVID-19. But the lung specialist saw clues that were “screaming blood clots.” So Poor pulled out a drug best known for treating strokes, and he held his breath.
“I said, â€What do we actually have to lose?’” Poor said. “That’s when I decided to give not just a blood thinner but a blood-clot buster.”
Exactly what’s going on with blood clots in at least some COVID-19 patients is a mystery.
Chinese doctors were first to sound the alarm. In March, Chinese heart specialists advised the American College of Cardiology to watch for clots and said certain blood tests showing a rise in clot risk might signal which patients were in greatest danger. Other reports suggested the clots can show up all over the body. But were they a cause of deterioration or an effect?
Already, many hospitals are attempting preventive doses of blood thinners to keep clots from forming. There’s huge debate over what kind to try, what dose is safe — the drugs can cause dangerous bleeding — and how soon to start.
In New York, Poor was going a step further with a drug called tissue plasminogen activator, or tPA, which doesn’t prevent clots — it breaks them up.
It’s an example of how, with no vaccine or approved treatment for COVID-19, many overwhelmed doctors are following trails of clues to figure out what to try next.
Some patients who have recovered from coronavirus infection are suffering lasting damage, including liver damage, heart damage and blood clotting problems.
Poor’s 55-year-old patient wasn’t getting enough oxygen even after doctors rolled her onto her stomach for an extreme ventilation technique called “prone positioning.” She was in shock. Other organs were failing fast.
Twenty minutes after the injection of tPA, her oxygen levels rose. Poor was elated. But not for long.
“She gets better, but then she starts to get worse,” he said. “Most likely we’re breaking up the clot, but she is immediately forming the clot again.”
So he tried something novel, putting the woman on a low-dose drip of tPA for about 24 hours, together with a blood thinner, in hopes of chipping away at existing clots while blocking new ones.
To Poor’s dismay, the experimental treatment bought the woman only a few more days of life. A sudden, different complication killed her on Friday.
But last weekend, Poor’s team tested the new clot-fighting approach in four other severely ill patients. One didn’t survive, dying of cardiac arrest from a massive blood clot in his heart.
The rest saw improvement in oxygen levels and shock. As of Friday, three remained on ventilators but were doing better, especially one who had been treated soon after her lungs failed. In a new report, Poor called for urgent study of whether abnormal clotting drives at least some patients’ deterioration, even as his own hospital updated treatment advice for its sickest cases.
The novel coronavirus is making plain each day just how vulnerable we humans are to a brand new infectious disease. But humanity has an ally in robots.
Others are onto the same lead. Specialists at the University of Colorado and Harvard recently published a similar tPA research call and cited three additional cases in which it was tried, as hospitals in Colorado and Massachusetts prepare for a study.
“We’re taking care of extremely ill patients that are dying in front of us, and we can’t get any diagnostic testing,” yet still have to make treatment decisions, said Dr. Steven Pugliese, a pulmonologist at the University of Pennsylvania.
Pugliese called Poor’s tPA report “very intriguing” and concluded: “What these doctors did in these very ill patients who were dying was a judgment call, and it was the right thing to do.”
But with the bleeding risk, the strategy has to be studied in carefully chosen patients, Pugliese said, especially with no good way to tell in advance who really has these tiny clots.
Poor first noticed oddities as his ICU filled with patients who just weren’t responding to care the way doctors expected. They were on breathing machines after developing acute respiratory distress syndrome, or ARDS. It’s an inflammatory form of lung failure that, when caused by other infections, stiffens lungs.
At least early on, Poor didn’t see that.
“It was like â€Groundhog Day’ with each patient,” he said, referring to the movie in which the same events repeat day after day. They had severe abnormalities in oxygen and carbon dioxide levels, but, “shockingly, their lungs were not stiff.”
He recalled Italian doctors who spotted the same thing and wrote in an American Thoracic Society journal that COVID-19 was causing atypical ARDS.
Several groups of researchers are testing different methods to divert critically ill COVID-19 patients from needing ventilators in the first place.
Back in Poor’s hospital, when ventilated patients had improved enough to allow them to wake up a bit, alarms would sound as their blood oxygen levels immediately plummeted.
“The residents would yell at me, â€So and so is desaturating!’” Poor recalled. “Classically in ARDS, we think that’s because the lung is collapsing.” But it wasn’t.
Poor often treats patients for pulmonary embolism, a large clot in the lungs that can quickly kill. The COVID-19 patients didn’t look quite like that. Nor were their hearts struggling to pump blood into the lungs.
Then, as he was doing laundry at 2 a.m., Poor remembered a rare disease in which some lung blood vessels abnormally dilate even as others are clogged. If that explains the COVID-19 contradictions, he thought, a clot-buster might help.
“I did a case series of five. This does not prove anything,” he cautioned. “Perhaps it brings light to possibilities where further research can delve into what exactly is going on.”
