Trump official Navarro convicted of contempt after defying House Jan. 6 subpoena
Trump White House official Peter Navarro has been convicted of contempt charges for refusing to cooperate with a House inquiry into the Jan. 6 Capitol attack.
WASHINGTON — Trump White House official Peter Navarro was convicted Thursday of contempt of Congress charges for refusing to cooperate with a congressional investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.
The verdict came after a short trial for Navarro, who served as a White House trade advisor and later promoted President Trump’s baseless claims of mass voter fraud in the 2020 election he lost.
Navarro was the second Trump aide to face contempt of Congress charges after former White House advisor Stephen K. Bannon. Convicted of two counts, Bannon was sentenced to four months behind bars, though he has been free pending appeal.
Judge Amit Mehta scheduled Navarro’s sentencing for Jan. 12. He was convicted in Washington’s federal courthouse of two misdemeanor counts of contempt of Congress, both punishable by up to a year behind bars.
Defense attorney Stanley Woodward moved for a mistrial, saying that the jurors had taken an outdoor break near where protesters and media regularly gather outside the courthouse and came back with a verdict shortly after. Mehta did not immediately rule, but said he would consider written arguments on the issue.
Prosecutors said Navarro acted as if he were “above the law†when he defied a subpoena for documents and a deposition from the House Jan. 6 committee.
Indicted for refusing to cooperate with the Jan. 6, Navarro lives down to his reputation
A defense attorney argued Navarro didn’t purposely ignore the House Jan. 6 committee. Navarro instead told staffers to contact Trump about what might be protected by executive privilege, something that didn’t happen, Woodward argued.
A judge has ruled the executive privilege argument isn’t a defense against the charges, finding Navarro couldn’t show that Trump had invoked it. But Woodward said prosecutors hadn’t proved that Navarro acted “willfully†or only out of loyalty to Trump.
“Do we know that his failure to comply beyond reasonable doubt wasn’t the result of accident, inadvertence or mistake?†he said.
Prosecutors, though, said Navarro should have handed over what material he could and flagged any questions or documents believed to be protected under executive privilege. They said much of the material the committee sought was already publicly available.
“Peter Navarro made a choice. He chose not [to] abide by the congressional subpoena,†prosecutor Elizabeth Aloi said. “The defendant chose allegiance to former President Donald Trump over compliance to the subpoena.â€
Trump faces a federal indictment in Washington and a state indictment in Georgia over his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss to Joe Biden, a Democrat. He has denied wrongdoing and has said he was acting within the law.
The House Jan. 6 committee finished its work in January, after a final report that said Trump criminally engaged in a “multi-part conspiracy†to overturn the lawful results of the 2020 election and failed to act to stop a mob of his supporters from attacking the Capitol.
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox three times per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
