President Trump brags about American power and respect while he trades it away
- Share via
A staple of Donald Trump’s rally repertoire for years has been his claim that, under him, the United States is respected again in the world. Like so much that he says, the president’s boast has been demonstrably wrong since his first term, according to repeated global surveys.
But give Trump some benefit of the doubt: He must have meant respected in the anti-democratic world, the one led by the actual dictators he so admires, not least Russia’s Vladimir Putin. Even within that sorry circle, including the tyrants of China and North Korea, it’s unclear that Trump is respected so much as he’s appreciated as a useful idiot, giving new meaning to that Cold War term for easily manipulated fools.
That Trump would so publicly embrace their world and forfeit his nation’s 80-year leadership of the free world is what made his shameful showdown in the Oval Office on Friday with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Putin’s nemesis, so historic in all the wrong ways.
Democrats are all but impotent; Republicans have capitulated; the media is fractured. There’s only one bulwark left to counter the emergency unfolding in Washington
If only the nearby bust of Winston Churchill could have talked.
He’d no doubt have demanded that Trump remove him from the room rather than witness a U.S. president giving the back of his hand to an ally resisting an invader, with Vice President JD Vance piling on. Franklin D. Roosevelt didn’t try to extract from Churchill half of Britain’s coal wealth in return for American assistance in World War II, much as Trump is seeking Ukraine’s mineral treasure. Nor did FDR mock Churchill’s wartime “siren suit” onesie that the prime minister wore on U.S. visits, as Trump’s crowd did the dressed-down Zelensky.
The fallout from the Friday debacle could be calamitous. In his first term, Trump shook U.S. allies with his disdain for international alliances and his flirtation with fascists. But after his 2020 defeat and President Biden’s repair of America’s global ties, especially in support of Ukraine, allies could — and did — hope that Trump had been an aberration. But that hope is all but gone with Trump restored to power, the despair exacerbated by the performance of the young vice president who represents the Trumpian future of the Republican Party.
Perhaps Trump wasn’t all that proud of the clash with Zelensky, despite the over-the-top praise from sycophantic Cabinet members, near verbatim, that he’d stood up for America. He didn’t mention the spat in his 99-minute address Tuesday to a joint session of Congress. He did note that he’d gotten a letter that day from Zelensky expressing Ukraine’s willingness to negotiate peace and to sign a minerals deal.
President Trump has been pining for the Nobel since his first presidency, if only, say his supporters, ‘it were fairly awarded.’
Trump hit on a lot of other notes from the “America first” playlist that vex democratic allies. Although French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer each corrected Trump last week during their separate visits to the White House, the truth-immune Trump still told Congress and a national TV audience that the United States has spent about $350 billion to aid Ukraine — “like taking candy from a baby” — while Europe has provided only $100 billion. In fact, the United States has spent about one-third of the amount that Trump claims, and Europe more.
He said of the Panama Canal, “We’re taking it back.” As for Greenland, a self-governing territory of North Atlantic Treaty Organization ally Denmark, Trump proclaimed, “One way or the other, we’re going to get it.” Republicans erupted in laughter, because, you know, hearing a supposed leader of the free world threatening a sovereign nation’s land is so funny. Trump bragged about withdrawing the United States (again) from the 196-nation Paris climate pact — he falsely claimed it was costing trillions of dollars that other countries don’t pay — as well as from “the corrupt [not] World Health Organization.”
For U.S. allies, none of that talk was as shocking as the convulsion that Trump and his lackeys delivered throughout February — a new world order that included restoring U.S. relations with Putin, even siding with Russia against a pro-Ukraine vote at the United Nations; scolding Europe and all but endorsing Germany’s neo-Nazi party, and then humiliating Zelensky in the Oval Office.
Mere weeks into Donald Trump’s comeback presidency, many of his moves are making Americans less secure at home and abroad.
The European Union’s top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, immediately wrote on social media words that I, as an American, never expected to read: “Today it became clear that the free world needs a new leader.” Just as unbelievable: The pinch-me glee of Igor Korotchenko, a well-known Russian military analyst, who exulted on X that he never thought he’d applaud a U.S. president, until Trump tossed out Zelensky “like a garbage alley cat.” Russian analysts predicted Putin would take Trump’s favor as a license to grab more land in advance of any peace deal.
Over the weekend, to offset Trump’s affront, 18 European allies embraced Zelensky, literally, at an emergency meeting in London of a new “coalition of the willing” to secure a peace agreement less advantageous to Russia than what Trump has in mind. Starmer said the United Kingdom would back Ukraine “for as long as it takes” — echoing then-President Biden’s now-dead words about the United States.
Trump’s tariffs against neighbors Canada and Mexico this week are icing on a rancid cake. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau condemned the action Tuesday with rare venom: “The United States launched a trade war against Canada, their closest partner and ally, their closest friend. At the same time, they’re talking about working positively with Russia, appeasing Vladimir Putin, a lying, murderous dictator. Make that make sense.”
You can’t. Respected in the world again? Another Trump lie.
Insights
L.A. Times Insights delivers AI-generated analysis on Voices content to offer all points of view. Insights does not appear on any news articles.
Viewpoint
Perspectives
The following AI-generated content is powered by Perplexity. The Los Angeles Times editorial staff does not create or edit the content.
Ideas expressed in the piece
- The article argues that President Trump’s foreign policy undermines democratic alliances while favoring authoritarian leaders like Vladimir Putin, citing his public humiliation of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and prioritization of a minerals deal over Ukraine’s sovereignty[6]. This aligns with broader critiques of Trump’s transactional approach to international relations, including threats to annex Greenland and reclaim the Panama Canal[1][3].
- Trump’s claims of restoring global respect for the U.S. are contradicted by global surveys and actions such as withdrawing from the Paris Agreement and World Health Organization, which critics argue isolate America from multilateral cooperation[6][3]. His tariffs on Canada and Mexico, described as “launching a trade war” against close allies, further strained relationships with democratic partners[6][3].
- The administration’s alignment with Russia during UN votes and its dismissal of European contributions to Ukraine’s defense are portrayed as abandoning postwar U.S. leadership, prompting allies to seek new coalitions without American involvement[6][2].
Different views on the topic
- Supporters contend that Trump’s “America First” policies prioritize national interests by leveraging tariffs and strategic disengagement from global institutions, arguing this strengthens U.S. sovereignty and economic security[4][5]. For example, his executive order centralizing foreign policy under the Secretary of State aims to eliminate bureaucratic inefficiencies and ensure diplomatic actions align strictly with presidential directives[4].
- Proponents highlight the administration’s focus on deterring adversaries like China and Russia through a mix of hard power (military readiness) and soft power (economic pressure), as outlined in congressional testimony advocating for a “peace through strength” approach[5][3]. The proposed peace plan for Ukraine, which ties aid to negotiated settlements, is framed as a pragmatic strategy to end prolonged conflict[3].
- Conservatives defend Trump’s transactional alliances and expansionist rhetoric—such as tariffs on trading partners and territorial ambitions—as necessary to counter perceived exploitation by global competitors and reassert U.S. dominance in a shifting geopolitical landscape[1][5]. Efforts to reform international organizations like the UN are justified as curbing inefficiency and bias against American interests[3][6].
Get the latest from Jackie Calmes
Commentary on politics and more from award-winning opinion columnist.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
