Clinton won’t take sides on Keystone but says it shouldn’t be a litmus test
Reporting from Nashua, N.H. — The controversial Keystone XL pipeline should not be the sole litmus test by which environmental advocates judge presidential candidates, Hillary Rodham Clinton said Tuesday.
“I recognize advocates feel strongly, I respect that,†Clinton said, but “I would respectfully disagree†with those who say that the Keystone project is the “overriding threat†to the world’s climate.
Clinton, the former secretary of State, has repeatedly declined to state a position on the Keystone project, saying it would be “inappropriate†for her to “prejudge†the decision that President Obama may make about whether to approve it.
TRAIL GUIDE: Daily tour through the wilds of the 2016 presidential campaign >>
“I’m in a different position†than other candidates who have taken sides on Keystone because of her previous role in the administration, Clinton told reporters during a news conference here after a town-hall meeting with voters.
The proposed pipeline would bring oil from Canada’s tar-sands deposits to refineries on the U.S. Gulf Coast. Because it would cross the border, it requires a permit from the State Department. The department began the review of the project during Clinton’s tenure. The Obama administration has repeatedly delayed a decision on it, saying it needs further study.
The project has become a rallying point in the debate over climate change. Opponents see the pipeline as a symbol of continued dependence on fossil fuels and believe that blocking it would spur the transition to a non-oil economy. They also note that tar-sands oil is dirtier than conventional oil and say that development of Canada’s reserves inevitably would increase greenhouse gas emissions.
See the most-read stories this hour >>
Obama has said he would approve the pipeline only if it can be demonstrated that it wouldn’t increase emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases blamed for warming the world’s climate.
Supporters of the pipeline, who include most Republican lawmakers and some unions, argue that it would provide the U.S. with a secure source of energy and would generate jobs. They also say that Canada will develop the oil fields regardless of whether the pipeline is built and that blocking the route would simply shift the oil to less-safe methods of transportation, such as rail cars.
Clinton, who held the roughly 20-minute news conference here after a town hall in which she answered a range of questions from voters, downplayed Keystone’s importance, noting that the U.S. has “dozens of pipelines currently crossing our border with Canada†and citing other, pressing threats to the climate, including the rapid growth of coal-powered electrical generation in China.
Republicans, she said, have refused to consider climate change an issue.
“Anybody who is concerned about the climate†will see that Clinton’s policies on the topic, which she began to unveil over the weekend, are “a comprehensive approach,†she said.
During the town hall, Clinton deflected a question from a voter who asked for a “yes-or-no†answer on Keystone. If Obama has not resolved the issue, and “it’s undecided when I’m elected president, I will answer your question,†she said.
Republicans accused Clinton of dodging the issue. Clinton “will say or do anything†to win, Republican National Committee spokesperson Michael Short said in a statement.
For more on politics and policy, follow @DavidLauter.
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox three times per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
