You heard it through the grapevine: The Ed Sheeran-Marvin Gaye trial starts today
What’s going on with the latest copyright infringement case against Ed Sheeran?
Sheeran is testifying in a trial that will determine whether the British pop sensation stole musical property from Motown legend Marvin Gaye. The trial is set to begin Monday in Manhattan with jury selection and opening statements.
In 2016, the family of Gaye’s late songwriting partner, Ed Townsend, filed a lawsuit alleging that Sheeran’s popular track “Thinking Out Loud†plagiarized the Gaye classic “Let’s Get It On.†Townsend’s heirs contend in the complaint that “Thinking Out Loud†pilfers “the heart†of “Let’s Get It On†by using “melodic, harmonic and rhythmic compositions†that are “substantially and/or strikingly similar to the drum composition†of Gaye’s sexy tune.
The heirs of a co-writer on Marvin Gaye’s seductive soul smash “Let’s Get It On†have sued Ed Sheeran, saying he lifted fundamental elements of the Motown artist’s composition.
Sheeran’s attorneys have countered in court documents that “the two songs share versions of a similar and unprotectable chord progression that was freely available to all songwriters.â€
Meanwhile, Townsend family attorneys have argued that Sheeran has acknowledged an undeniable resemblance between the hit records by playing mashups of “Thinking Out Loud†and “Let’s Get It On†during live performances. Other acts, such as Boyz II Men, also have performed musical arrangements that combine the songs, according to the lawsuit.
The judge overseeing the trial, Louis L. Stanton, denied the plaintiffs’ motion to play for the jury a video of Sheeran performing a “Let’s Get It Onâ€-infused rendition of “Thinking Out Loud.†However, Stanton has promised to reconsider the request depending on the evidence presented in the Manhattan federal courtroom.
‘I have a real eating problem,’ Ed Sheeran says. The musician detailed fraught relationships with food, alcohol, drugs and his body for Rolling Stone.
Prominent civil rights attorney Ben Crump — who represents the Townsend family — has claimed that Sheeran “blatantly took a Black artist’s music who he doesn’t view as worthy [of] compensation,†echoing accusations leveled in the past against famed white musicians such as the Beatles and Elvis Presley.
(At press time, Crump reportedly was not involved in the trial. This story has since been updated to reflect that he is participating in the trial.)
Though both tracks rely on romantic themes, the jury will be instructed to ignore elements such as lyrics and tone while comparing only the musical foundations of “Thinking Out Loud†and “Let’s Get It On.â€
This is not Sheeran’s first copyright-infringement battle. Last year, he won a case in the United Kingdom targeting his 2017 smash “Shape of You.†He also faced a $20-million lawsuit in 2016 over his song “Photograph.â€
Author David Ritz reflects on two of his literary subjects: the great soul singer Marvin Gaye and his late ex-wife and inspiration, Janis Gaye.
“I feel like claims like this are way too common now and have become a culture where a claim is made with the idea that a settlement will be cheaper than taking it to court, even if there is no basis for the claim,†Sheeran said in a video shared last year on social media. “It’s really damaging to the songwriting industry.â€
By bringing this case, Townsend’s family members are following in the footsteps of Gaye’s heirs, who previously won $7.4 million after suing Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams for modeling their chart-topping single “Blurred Lines†after Gaye’s “Got to Give It Up.â€
The current Sheeran trial is expected to last about a week.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
The biggest entertainment stories
Get our big stories about Hollywood, film, television, music, arts, culture and more right in your inbox as soon as they publish.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
