L.A. City Council backs effort to block Bulgari development - Los Angeles Times
Advertisement

L.A. City Council backs effort to block Bulgari development in Benedict Canyon

A woman and a man talk, both seated at a dais and dressed in business attire.
Los Angeles City Councilmember Katy Yaroslavsky, left, speaks with Council President Paul Krekorian at a meeting in May. The council on Wednesday backed Yaroslavsky’s motion seeking to stop the Bulgari Resort Los Angeles, a planned 58-room hotel in Benedict Canyon.
(Jay L. Clendenin / Los Angeles Times)
Share via

The Los Angeles City Council on Wednesday moved to try to block a developer’s planned luxury hotel in Benedict Canyon amid opposition from some neighbors and the council member who represents the hillside area.

On an 8-6 vote, the council backed Councilmember Katy Yaroslavsky’s motion asking the city’s planning director to intervene and consider stopping the proposed Bulgari Resort Los Angeles.

Developer Gary Safady’s planned 58-room hotel is already going through the city’s environmental review process after clearing an initial city planning hurdle several years ago. However, the resort hasn’t been approved by the City Council and would need another vote once its environmental review is done.

Advertisement

Gary Safady’s plan for a luxury hotel has lined up A-list names as backers. It also has plenty of high-profile celebrities among its critics.

Yaroslavsky argues that the hotel is inappropriate for the area, particularly amid the growing threat of hillside fires. She has spent the last several months trying to halt the project from continuing through the review phase.

“The last thing we should be doing is putting a hotel smack in the middle of a high-fire-severity zone,†Yaroslavsky said. “Simply put, it is the wrong project in the wrong location and shouldn’t have gotten this far in the first place.â€

The council’s action Wednesday doesn’t stop the development but instead asks city Planning Director Vince Bertoni to intervene and rescind the initiation of a General Plan amendment.

Advertisement

Shortly after Wednesday’s vote, the Planning Department said in a statement it “will carefully consider†the council’s request.

“The department will review a number of factors, including those cited in the City Council motion and during council deliberation, and render a decision,†the statement said.

Yaroslavsky previously brought her motion to the council this spring, but her colleagues deadlocked, so another vote was needed. Some members had expressed concern about intervening during a project’s environmental review.

Advertisement

Councilmember Traci Park, who represents the Westside, voted for the motion Wednesday after voting against it in May.

Park told the council that she’d spoken to “constituents from across the hillsides, including many from my own district — residents who care deeply about our natural resources and who worry about the precedent that this project sets for the health of our Santa Monica Mountains.â€

Park also mentioned hillside fires, a “concern which is even more timely in light of the devastating fires in Maui.â€

Safady, the developer of the planned resort, and dozens of construction workers who came to Wednesday’s meeting in support of the project gathered outside the council chambers after the vote. Safady said the fight wasn’t over and “now it’s on the mayor’s office.â€

Anne-Marie Otey, communications and editorial director of the Los Angeles /Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council, also spoke to the workers and told them to reach out to the council members, including Councilmember Tim McOsker. McOsker voted for Yaroslavsky’s motion.

Advertisement

She told the workers that McOsker, a harbor-area council member who won election last year, is “supposed to be one of ours.â€

“We’re looking to him to continue to be a supporter of organized labor,†Otey told The Times in a brief interview. “We supported him strongly in his efforts to be elected.â€

Asked about Otey’s comments, McOsker told the Times that he’s long supported unions and will continue to back labor causes.

“I can understand the disappointment for proponents of this project, but I believe that working with labor shouldn’t be, and isn’t, a ‘one and done situation,’†McOsker said.

A representative of Mayor Karen Bass’ office didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. Bass, who has the ability to hire and fire the city’s planning director, opposed the proposed resort last year on the campaign trail.

Advertisement