Police Resistance to Gutting DARE Program Angers Panel

By JILL LEOVY

April 30, 2002 12 AM PT

TIMES STAFF WRITER

Los Angeles Police Commission members didn’t shrink at ousting a powerful and popular police chief. But they seem to have found a more formidable adversary in DARE, the LAPD’s longtime drug-abuse education program.

Commissioners first talked about gutting DARE’s staff two months ago to free up more officers for the LAPD’s depleted narcotics and gang units.

The deliberations have unfolded quietly in recent months in the shadow of the higher-profile controversy over the commission’s rejection of a second five-year-term for Chief Bernard C. Parks.

Parks is now out, but DARE remains standing. Despite commissioners’ repeated requests, LAPD officials have yet to provide them with the “creative solutions” they had requested so that most DARE officers might be temporarily shifted to other duties and the program replaced by something else.

In fact, as the debate stretches into its third month, LAPD brass appears to be more interested in arguing DARE’s merits and protecting it from further cuts than in responding to the commission’s requests.

At the commission’s most recent meeting on DARE, little progress was made, and the discussion was continued into next week.

Rather than working toward resolution, police officials and commissioners seemed to argue past each other.

Pressed to come up with a replacement for DARE, Deputy Chief J.I. Davis dug in his heels. “DARE has a very positive role,” he told commissioners calmly.

On the commissioners’ side, though, patience was wearing thin. “Didn’t we ask for some creative solutions?” Commissioner Silvia Saucedo asked. “Wasn’t that due to us today?”

She didn’t get an answer from the assembled LAPD officials. But commission President Rick Caruso offered one instead. “Yeah,” he grumbled, “it was. And we got a new memo that just says, ‘No.’”

At issue for the Police Commission is a more far-reaching question than the future of school-based anti-drug officers: how to persuade LAPD officials to do what civilian overseers want.

For years, critics have griped that the LAPD’s paramilitary culture has resisted civilian oversight to the detriment of civil rights, and that the Police Commission--civilians appointed by the mayor to oversee the department--has never quite managed to assert sufficient control.

Now, the police commissioners, most of them appointed last year by Mayor James K. Hahn, want to establish their authority as managers in ways they believe eluded their predecessors. And they are learning just how difficult that can be.

“I think it’s a cultural thing,” Caruso said. “There is a history of giving an answer that is not really an answer and hoping it just goes away.”

Commissioners began considering ways to reduce or eliminate DARE in February in response to concerns that narcotics crime-fighting units, in particular, had been cut excessively and that officers needed to be transferred from elsewhere to help rebuild them.

They were responding in part to the protests of a group of Boyle Heights residents, who in arguing passionately for more narcotics officers, cited rising gang violence.

The department’s overall personnel crisis results from a shortage of police recruits that has most profoundly affected specialized units. Strapped for officers, the department has been shifting people from these units back to patrol to ensure sufficient numbers to answer emergency calls.

The DARE program has been among those cut, but it has not lost as many positions as narcotics.

DARE is now allotted 119 officers on paper but, in reality, it is functioning with 71. Hahn’s proposed city budget for next year would in essence make the vacancies permanent, capping it at 74 officers.

But the commission wants the number of sworn officers cut to about six, with civilians or retired officers taking up the slack.

DARE deploys uniformed police officers to schools to educate children on the perils of drug use. The program was created by the LAPD in 1983 and has since spread worldwide. Although DARE’s effectiveness has been questioned by some experts, its rapid expansion in Los Angeles and elsewhere testifies to its popularity.

Supporters say that, besides discouraging drug use, DARE improves school safety by bringing officers to campuses and is also a valuable officer recruitment tool. Moreover, LAPD officials argue that the program represents one of the department’s few efforts that focuses on crime prevention, and that it would be short-sighted to gut it to meet short-term needs.

The program also is a point of pride for the LAPD.

“If you look at the achievements of LAPD in the last 50 years, the two things that have been most innovative are SWAT and DARE,” said Charlie Parsons, executive director of DARE America, the nonprofit corporation that sponsors the program. “To consider dropping DARE is incredible.”

Commission President Caruso counters that, in the face of rising gang violence, the department cannot afford to keep 71 officers in the drug education program.

“I knew when I raised this it was not going to be the most popular issue, but I think you have to balance priorities,” Caruso lectured Davis and another acting chief, Michael Bostic, at the panel’s most recent meeting. “There are people dying in the streets.”

Previously, commissioners had asked police officials to suggest ways to keep the program in an altered form, perhaps by using retired officers or civilians, while allowing most sworn officers to be transferred, leaving just half a dozen now assigned to magnet schools.

But to Caruso’s consternation, police officials responded by explaining that such options would not work, presenting commissioners with what he called an “all or nothing” dilemma.

LAPD officials have defended the response. “We cannot lie to him,” said DARE Capt. Mark Perez.

The resulting lengthy public debate at the panel’s recent meeting often seemed to go in circles.

LAPD officials touted the benefits of DARE and argued that if its officers were transferred, the program might never be restored.

Commissioners replied that they weren’t questioning the merits of the program but favored other priorities.

“I don’t think eliminating units is the answer,” Bostic told commissioners.

“We have been asking for this for months!” Caruso shot back. As the debate wore on, he slumped deeper into his chair, his chin propped on one fist.

Finally, LAPD Cmdr. Valentino Paniccia pushed him too far. Paniccia suggested that the commission would “sacrifice thousands of kids” in a misguided effort to bolster patrol units.

Caruso bolted upright. “I think that’s unfair!” he snapped. “Don’t lay that on my lap. Why don’t you go to Boyle Heights and ask the parents how they feel about kids being shot?”

In the end, the commission tabled the issue for two weeks at the request of Commissioner Rose Ochi, DARE’s main backer on the panel.

But Caruso said a majority of commissioners are close to deciding to transfer DARE officers by fiat--whether the department likes it or not.

The LAPD needs to get used to it, Caruso said. “This commission is strong enough, and I am determined enough, that we are going to stand our ground.”