Malibu Council OKs Revised Plan for Marine Sanctuary
The Malibu City Council has approved a scaled-back version of a marine refuge, limiting the proposed coastal sanctuary to two small no-take zones and designated tide pools after legislators said they could not back a more extensive plan.
In letters to the city, Sen. Tom Hayden (D-Los Angeles) and Assemblywoman Sheila Kuehl (D-Santa Monica) said they supported the concept of a refuge, but added that there is a lack of scientific data supporting the need for a sanctuary as large as the one the council originally backed. That plan included a ban on commercial fishing along 27 miles of the coastline, creating one of the biggest marine preserves in the state.
“I don’t want to bring a bill [before the Legislature] that’s DOA,†Kuehl said. “I want the people in Malibu and all along the coast to know I’m very serious about this and I think it’s an important matter . . . but my job is to make sure we have a bill that passes.â€
The smaller version of the marine refuge approved Wednesday night matches the concept supported by a UCLA report the city commissioned last fall to determine the need for coastal protection.
Although the study recommended a limited refuge, the City Council voted in December for a more expansive sanctuary that would have prohibited commercial fishing along the city’s coastline, sparking protests from fisherman.
Some City Council members expressed disappointment that the legislators declined to support a larger refuge, arguing that they were bowing to fishing industry pressures.
“I think [a more extensive refuge] is needed . . . but the political facts of life are that the fisherman have a very powerful lobby,†said Councilman Walt Keller.
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
