BRIAN MURPHY
- Share via
The ultra-hip pay Murphy up to $150 a square foot to make a quasi-disposable statement about the temporal nature of art. That’s L.A. all right, the birthplace of the retrench-and-rethink-it-later mentality. I find it somehow fitting that the New York Times lands butter-side-up in Murphy’s favor. The world-class curmudgeons of that city historically take great pleasure in declaring Los Angeles a vapid and humorless place in the throes of a terrible irony shortage, and even our own Los Angeles critics perceive Murphy as a trendoid; yet given enough ink to digest his architectural innuendoes, New York likes him and, by association, us! But does New York appreciate Murphy for his artless statement of up-and-coming L.A. style, or is it rather because someone is finally building homes that substantiate who we really are? Do our Murphy homes proclaim: “Since we are rich enough to look like we don’t care, we can afford to hire someone to get the jokes he plays on us”?
One hundred and fifty dollars a square foot seems steep for a green fiberglass punch line. To be honest, I have only one hopefully ironic enough rhetorical question--can you harvest real bananas in the foyer?
Now that would be a statement.
ROBBIE FRANDSEN, Redondo Beach
More to Read
The biggest entertainment stories
Get our big stories about Hollywood, film, television, music, arts, culture and more right in your inbox as soon as they publish.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.