âHatchet IIâ director worries the MPAA will swing back: âIâm scaredâ
This article was originally on a blog post platform and may be missing photos, graphics or links. See About archive blog posts.
New York writer Michael Giltz digs deep into the looming unrated release âHatchet II,â which arrives in theaters after a major MPAA squabble and plenty of splatter.
The movie âHatchet IIâ will be unrated when it hits the top 20 or so markets on Oct. 1 via Dark Sky and the AMC chain, making it perhaps the widest released unrated horror film since George Romeroâs landmark âDawn Of The Deadâ opened in the U.S. in 1979.
Thatâs made âHatchet IIâ an instant cause celebre among horror fans tired of denuded fright flicks, the latest flashpoint in the endless debate over the MPAA rating system and â- some say â- an ironic victim of the MPAAâs desire to look tough on violence.
For director Adam Green, whose original âHatchetâ grossed more than $3 million on DVD, the moment is exhilarating.
âThis is a great opportunity for [fans] to go see something that theyâd never normally gotten to see in a theater and I think thatâs very exciting,â says Green. He spoke by cell from Leicester Square in London on Thursday night while âHatchet IIâ made its world premiere during Frightfest, the largest horror film festival in the world.
While distancing himself from online headlines like the one on Cinematical, heâs thrilled by the comments of people like Steve âUncle Creepyâ Barton, the editor-in-chief of horror site DreadCentral. Barton urges people to make a statement by buying tickets to the film even if they donât even live near one of the cities where itâs showing.
âWould you pay 10 bucks to make a statement that you support unrated releases in theaters?â Barton asked readers. âItâs a lot to ask, but you know what? I would and I will. This release could very well be an opportunity to change the game as we know it and have begrudgingly accepted it.â
But in some ways, Green is as nervous as the audience watching his movie. And not in a fun way. âIâm scared though,â Green admitted. âI donât want to be singled out and have them mad at me or something because theyâre a tough organization....â
MPAA ratings controversies arenât unusual and neither are unrated films -â especially in the art-house world. The MPAA came under fire for slapping an R on the acclaimed documentary âThe Tillman Storyâ strictly for numerous uses of the F-word, including the dying comment of football star and battlefield symbol Pat Tillman. And one of the biggest foreign language hits of the year is the unrated âGirl With The Dragon Tattoo,â which has hit $12.5 million at the U.S. box office.
Like many filmmakers, Green submitted a cut with some ideas of where he might trim to appease the MPAA board.
âWe submitted a version,â says Green. âWe cut a minute out of it and then we submitted it again. Then they came back being very specific saying, âThese are things we have a problem with and you just canât do that.ââ
Kirby Dick, the Oscar-nominated filmmaker who made âThis Film Is Not Yet Rated,â an expose of the MPAA, laughs when he hears this description.
âThatâs a great quote. âYou just canât do that.â See, they have no standards to refer to,â explains Dick, whose most recent film is âOutrage.â âIf they said, âLook, we have very specific standards and these standards apply to all films, whether theyâre studio or non-studio,â then that might be an appropriate rating. Maybe you can disagree with their standards but at least they have something to reference to. They have nothing to reference to.â
Green was braced for the worst and ready to go straight to DVD in order to protect the film after his experience with the MPAA the first time around.
ââHatchet Iâ had no effects in it, it had no drug use, it had very little swearing,â says Green. âNobody even smoked a cigarette. And they came after it like it was the devil. Now with this one, none of their problems were for sexual content. Their problems were all for the level of violence.â
That, of course, is the exact opposite of the usual complaints about the MPAA, which historically is far more lenient about violence than sex in major studio releases. Is that an indicator that something else is afoot?
âAgain, I havenât seen the film, so I canât say,â says Dick. âBut it does raise the question. This is a non-studio film. [The MPAA is] always somewhat vulnerable to criticism that they are perhaps not rating violence harshly enough. Thereâs no question that thatâs the case. Is it possible that theyâre now selecting a non-studio film to come down hard on so that it looks like theyâre actually doing their job so maybe the next studio film they can let slide?â Barton of Dread Central believes the MPAA likes to make an example of horror films, which often come from smaller, independent studios and are less ârespectable.â
âYou look at movies like âInglorious Basterdsâ and movies like âThe Expendables,ââ says Barton. âThey are way, way more violent than the original âHatchetâ was. What makes it OK for them to say, âHey, well you can put this out there but this silly movie thatâs meant purely for fun in a tongue-in-cheek manner, that has to get cut to shreds because itâs a horror movie?ââ
Green believes if his film had been released by a major studio that Hatchet II would have sailed through easily.
âI think this movie should have gotten an R with some appropriate trims,â says the 35-year-old filmmaker. âBut it is extreme and I think it probably is one of the more gory movies out there. However, itâs all in good fun and nobodyâs going to walk out of this feeling like their eyes got raped or theyâre disturbed or having nightmares or anything. Theyâre just going to laugh. Thatâs why itâs so fun. If we had taken that stuff out, itâs like telling a joke without the punch line.â
Green has no desire to be seen as battling the board.
âI donât want to start a fight with the MPAA,â he says. âWeâre just choosing to go a different route. If the movie is successful and the fans show up, it could change the way horror movies are released and I think itâs time for that. Iâm not purposely trying to lead a revolution. Iâm just trying to do my thing.â
He adds finally: âThe movies Iâm making are not disturbing; theyâre not messed-up. Thereâs nothing different about them than what else is out there. So if they donât want to play, I just wonât play with them.â
--Michael Giltz
RECENT AND RELATED
âPiranha 3Dâ director: Itâs âGremlinsâ for adults
Lake Havasu fears âPiranhaâ could take bite out of tourism
âStar Warsâ producer rolls into horror with âPanzer 88â
âGalaxy of Terrorâ: Jim Cameron & giant, libidinous maggots
âPhantasm,â the 30-year reunion interview
Ridley Scott wants to make two âAlienâ prequels
George Romero loves zombies, the âgift that keeps givingâ
Horrible Movie Night in L.A. scares up a following
âTroll 2â: âIt speaks to the power of film -- good or badâ
FOR THE RECORD: An earlier version of this post misstated the DVD grosses of âHatchetâ as $10 million.